No more extra fingers? The good, bad and ugly of ChatGPT Images 2.0
Tech content creator Marcin Teodoru described an image output he received from ChatGPT Images 2.0 as "pixel perfect."
Greta CrossOpenAI launched a new image generator that may cut down the number of extra webbed fingers circling the internet.
On April 21, OpenAI launched ChatGPT Images 2.0. Released a year after the initial ChatGPT Images, the "state-of-the-art model" can search the internet for real-time information; process up to eight outputs at once; better create small text, iconography and dense compositions; offer renderings in a wider range of languages; and generate photos in varying aspect ratios, according to an OpenAI news release.
"Instead of getting something vaguely in the neighborhood of what you meant, you get something you can actually use," OpenAI said about the new generator in a news release.
ChatGPT Images 2.0 comes less than a month after OpenAI announced it was discontinuing its video generator, Sora. In December, Walt Disney Company announced it was making a $1 billion investment in OpenAI, allowing Sora users to create their own AI-generated Disney, Pixar, Marvel and Star Wars characters. The partnership has since ceased.
As more users try OpenAI's new image generator, here's what tech and media experts think.

What makes ChatGPT Images 2.0 better?
According to an OpenAI news release, here are the new features ChatGPT Images 2.0 offers:

- "Thinking capabilities" that can search for real-time information on the internet, create up to eight images from one prompt and double check outputs
- Training knowledge cutoff of December 2025, in hopes to provide the most up-to-date, accurate information
- Refined small text, iconography, dense compositions and stylistic constraints
- Up to 2K resolution
- Stronger understanding and rendering in non-English languages, including Japanese, Korean, Chinese, Hindi and Bengali
- Greater aspect ratio ranges, as wide as 3:1 and tall as 1:3
- Cross-platform collaboration with OpenAI's coding agent Codex
ChatGPT Images 2.0 also offers a new "thinking model," which takes more time to process a prompt in order to create a more refined output, according to the news release. Dependent on the prompt, this process may take a few minutes, OpenAI Product Manager Adele Li told USA TODAY.
Does ChatGPT Images 2.0 actually create stronger images?
ChatGPT Images 2.0 has received mixed reactions from users, with some thoroughly impressed by the new and improved outputs, while others are disappointed.
In a TikTok video posted on April 22, AI for Life founder Celia Quillian shared a handful of images she created with the new generator, including a full-body portrait of a woman and collage testing six different hairstyles on herself. She finds the generator's new capabilities impressive.

"This should be blowing your mind right now," Quillian said in her video. "It should also have you concerned because when you can make something this realistic in a matter of minutes and anyone can do it for free, that's going to open up a whole other can of worms."
Tech content creator Marcin Teodoru described a ChatGPT Images 2.0 output he received as "pixel perfect." In a TikTok video posted on April 21, Teodoru asked the image generator to analyze a screenshot of a website and create a version in dark mode, a user interface that displays text on a dark or black background. The result came back clear and accurate, with the website's text and imagery the same as the screenshot Teodoru submitted.
See examples from ChatGPT Images 2.0
Woody Hood, director of critical and creative media and film and media studies at Wake Forest University, wasn't impressed after playing around with the new image generator.
Woody told USA TODAY the generator's photorealism is done well but the proportionality of objects is "odd." Playing around, Woody asked ChatGPT Images 2.0 to create an image of a chicken chasing a butterfly on a tropical island. After receiving the first output, he continued to tweak his inputs. The prompts and resulting images are below:



Hood described the process of creating the chicken images like "chasing your own tail round and round."
"If I need to generate an image and be able to edit and improve it, then I need better quality control and better continuity across the images," he said. "I don’t want to fix one thing to have it alter something else that needs fixing."
After the chicken, Hood gave the AI a more complex prompt. His prompts and the resulting images are below:

Concerns about deepfakes and revenge porn
Kathryn Coduto, media science professor at Boston University, hasn't used ChatGPT Images 2.0 but told USA TODAY she has concerns about how an improved image generator could create a higher risk for deepfakes and more specifically, revenge porn.
"I still think there's this high, high risk for this to be used in a really negative way, in a way that is particularly harmful to certain types of people or people in certain types of relationships," Coduto said. "With something that becomes this refined, you can truly have a custom-generated anything but that means you're having custom-generated anything without the consent of lots and lots of people."
Deepfakes, AI-generated media (photos, videos or audio) that resemble a person's likeness, have been on a rampage over the past year.
In early April, an Ohio man was believed to be the first person in the country convicted under a new federal law for using AI-generated, sexually explicit images of women to harass them. Prosecutors accused 37-year-old James Strahler of creating more than 700 non-consensual images and videos of adult women and minors, harassing the women with phone calls, messages and online postings. He will be sentenced at a later date, according to the U.S. Attorney's Office.
How much does ChatGPT Images 2.0 cost?
ChatGPT Images 2.0 can be used for free. Users without paid subscriptions are limited to two to three free images per day. OpenAI says the software is better with an OpenAI Plus ($20/month) or Pro ($100/month) subscription.
Greta Cross is a national trending reporter at USA TODAY. Story idea? Email her at [email protected].